The most annoying BSN literalists

You know, it's been a long time since I went to the BSN. I left around the time Seival started making his little Synthesis group, which honestly is not a long way from being ready to be legally declared a cult (seriously, that guy creeps the jimmies out of me), and I came back recently just to see how things are going.

And god was I correct in leaving. Besides one or two reasonable people (Iedra is a good example, even if a non-ITer) the place is an hive of idiotic douches, and even the moderators are not above complete douchebaggery. But the most annoying of them all, to me, is Brovikk Rasputin.

Seriously, Hanar might be an asshole, Seival might be Charles Mason leves of creepy, but Brovikk is simply rude. He is an arrogant, megalomaniac douche with no rediming qualities argumentative-wise, stating his theories as facts, headcanoning more than anyone at BSN besides Seival, and "ruthlessly" attacking and insulting everyone who exposes the fallacies of his arguments and headcanons.

So I'm curious. Who in BSN rustles your jimmies more?

Do we really need this thread?

DoomsdayDevice wrote:Do we really need this thread?

´

Probably not, on retrospective, I just got into a very heated argument with this guy and was pissed off. Sorry if this comes of as unnecesarry.

I mean, we have a thread for the crazy things some people say... but a thread devoted to bashing specific individuals seems to be a bit in bad taste, IMO.

Maybe it's just me.

Wayning_Star.


.................what? What did I do?

Brovikk Rasputin is a name i know well enjoys beng antagonistic

I'm all for making fun of people who so richly deserve it, but a thread dedicated to one such person is too much.

DoomsdayDevice wrote:I mean, we have a thread for the crazy things some people say... but a thread devoted to bashing specific individuals seems to be a bit in bad taste, IMO.

Maybe it's just me.

Not only you. I also agree. Just try not to create too many problems please. :)

Kesak11 wrote:

DoomsdayDevice wrote:I mean, we have a thread for the crazy things some people say... but a thread devoted to bashing specific individuals seems to be a bit in bad taste, IMO.

Maybe it's just me.

Not only you. I also agree. Just try not to create too many problems please. :)

As I said before, I am sorry, this thread was created when I was extremely hotheaded. I'll try to avoid it in the future.

JamesStone wrote:

Kesak11 wrote:

DoomsdayDevice wrote:I mean, we have a thread for the crazy things some people say... but a thread devoted to bashing specific individuals seems to be a bit in bad taste, IMO.

Maybe it's just me.

Not only you. I also agree. Just try not to create too many problems please. :)

As I said before, I am sorry, this thread was created when I was extremely hotheaded. I'll try to avoid it in the future.

The mods have to check since someone tried using screenshots of the other literalist thread to prove we were all coming to kill them or something.

Kill this thread, there are a bunch who drive me nuts (not Literalists mind, just general a*holes) but let's not make celebrity superstars of them.

Lecture over!

Very well then.

Any discussion of literalist madmen and their crazy nonsense shall henceforth occur in this thread.

LOCKDOWN!